USA vs. China: The World Stands to Lose

By Qamar Bashir

It appears that the USA is feeling nervous, unsettled, and jittery due to China’s mature response to US accusations, charges, and intimidation, and is puzzled by China’s refusal to be drawn into a Cold War with the US and its allies. This unease was evident in an interview with CNN at the end of his visit to China (23-26 April) where US Secretary of State Antony Blinken leveled multiple accusations against China.
Blinken accused China of interfering in the 2024 US presidential elections, claiming that the USA has evidence of attempts to influence and interfere, which he deemed totally unacceptable. He reiterated his warning to China to cease playing on existing social divisions in the US in influence campaigns.
On the diplomatic front, Blinken warned China to halt its support for Russia’s efforts to ramp up production of tanks, munitions, and armored vehicles and to upgrade Russia’s defense industrial base. He threatened to sanction more than 100 Chinese entities and individuals if such support continues. He further threatened that if China did not comply, the US and its allies would increase pressure on
Chinese companies.
Recently, the US Congress and Senate approved $8 billion in military aid to
Taiwan to enhance its defensive and offensive capabilities. This move is seen as an
unnecessary provocation aimed at escalating tensions in the region, endangering
peace both regionally and globally. Additionally, the US Congress passed a bill to

ban the popular app TikTok in the US and imposed aggressive restrictions and
embargoes on semiconductor exports to China.
The US is concerned about China's advancements in semiconductor technology,
fourth-generation New Electric Vehicles (NEVs), solar panels, and lithium
batteries, which surpass those of the US and Europe. It is also impressed by
China's achievements in agriculture, green technologies, its advanced space
program, and its development of strong defense systems. The US accuses China of
engaging in unfair trade practices that threaten American jobs and businesses,
particularly in the lead-up to the November US presidential election. The US
argues that China's large capacity makes it difficult for the global market to absorb
its products, leading to challenges for American and other foreign firms.
Despite the US's aggressive stance, China has demonstrated patience, restraint, and
maturity. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi has responded to US accusations with
composed and logical arguments, rejecting unfounded claims without provoking or
antagonizing the US or its allies.
Regarding allegations of election manipulation, China has firmly denied any
intention to interfere in the US election. China maintains that it upholds friendly
relations with the American people based on mutual respect, peaceful coexistence,
and win-win cooperation. China asserts that meddling in another country's internal
affairs is not its approach to bilateral or multilateral relations.
China has taken a principled stand on the Russia-Ukraine war, advocating for
addressing the root causes of the conflict and considering the concerns of both
Russia and Ukraine. China has proposed an international peace conference to
resolve the crisis through diplomatic means. China has warned against exploiting
the situation for selfish gains and emphasized the need to avoid factionalism or
bloc confrontation.
Regarding Taiwan, China maintains that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, a
position reaffirmed by the Cairo Declaration in 1943, the Potsdam Declaration of
1945, and UN General Assembly Resolution 2758, which recognize the one-China
principle. China opposes the supply of arms to Taiwan, seeing it as increasing the

risk of conflict and undermining regional peace and stability. China considers the
Taiwan issue an internal matter, with reunification being a decision for the Chinese
people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. China has stated its unwavering
commitment to preventing Taiwan's separation from China, warning the US
against interfering in the region and underestimating China's resolve and defense
capabilities.
China has denounced the US containment policy as ineffective and
counterproductive, emphasizing the importance of friendly relations between the
two countries for the well-being of their peoples and the world. China believes that
US efforts to contain its development, impose sanctions, and hinder its science and
technology advancements will harm both nations.
Despite China's friendly approach and restraint, the US is applying its typical
carrot and stick strategy, which has worked with other nations, though it may need
to reconsider this approach with China.
The US strategy to manipulate China is indeed intriguing. Initially, it encouraged
reliance and dependence of Chinese companies on the US market, using this as
leverage to influence China's economy and its affairs. This includes imposing
embargoes, hefty taxes, and duties on Chinese exports, sanctioning Chinese
companies, and banning Chinese social media apps. The US is also pressuring its
allies to impose sanctions and fines on Chinese companies, encircling China to
intimidate and contain it.
The US is using rating, ranking, and indexing organizations to manipulate Chinese
financial, economic, and sovereign ratings in order to damage China's image and
that of its companies. It is leveraging existing alliances and forming new ones to
counter China. The US has also implemented a de-risking strategy to reduce
overreliance on China. Additionally, it has established the "Five Eyes," a spying
organization involving five countries focused on China. Finally, if peaceful
measures fail to achieve its objectives, the US may resort to kinetic means.
China, in contrast, has responded to US pressures with pragmatism, taking
numerous steps at its own expense to allay American concerns. However, despite

these efforts, US pressure on China continues to mount. The global community is
anxiously hoping that China's patience will not falter, and that tensions between the
two nations will ease. The alternative—a prolonged escalation of hostilities—is
deeply concerning and scary, given that the combined military capabilities of both
countries could devastate our planet multiple times over.

Spread the love

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Next Post

PM, IDB President agree to expedite different projects in Pakistan

Sun Apr 28 , 2024
UNS: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and President of Islamic Development Bank (IDB) Dr. Muhammad Sulaiman Al Jasser on Sunday agreed for early completion of different development projects financed by the institution in Pakistan. The prime minister thanked the IDB for its $1 billion worth investment on different uplift projects in […]

You May Like

Chief Editor

Iftikhar Mashwani

Quick Links