By Ahsan Ansari
As the United States gears up for the 2024 presidential elections, the political landscape is heating up with former President Donald Trump and current Vice President Kamala Harris emerging as the leading candidates from their respective parties. This election is poised to be one of the most contentious in recent history, reflecting deep divisions within the electorate and raising critical questions about the future of the nation.
Donald Trump served as the 45th President from 2017 to 2021 and remains a dominant figure in the Republican Party. His candidacy is characterized by a continuation of his “America First” policies, a focus on immigration reform, and a robust stance against perceived threats from abroad, particularly China. Trump’s supporters view him as a champion of conservative values and economic growth, while his critics argue that his divisive rhetoric undermines democratic institutions.
Kamala Harris as the first female Vice President and the first woman of South Asian and African American descent to hold the office, represents a significant shift in American politics. Her campaign focuses on social justice, climate change, and healthcare reform. Harris seeks to build on the accomplishments of the Biden administration while addressing the needs of a diverse electorate. However, she faces challenges in solidifying her base, particularly among younger voters who demand bold action on issues like climate change and racial equity. The economic recovery post-pandemic will be a major topic. Trump will likely tout his record on job growth and tax cuts, while Harris will emphasize equitable growth and support for middle-class families.
Kamala Harris will push for expanded access and affordability, building on the Affordable Care Act. Trump may advocate for a repeal of certain aspects of Obamacare, framing it as an impediment to economic freedom.
The climate change issue is expected to be a significant point of contention. Harris is likely to propose aggressive climate policies, while Trump may focus on energy independence and deregulation.
With ongoing debates surrounding police reform and systemic racism, Harris’s platform will likely emphasize reforms and support for marginalized communities, while Trump may take a law-and-order approach, appealing to voters concerned about crime.
As far as the US foreign policy is concerned, Trump’s “America First” approach contrasts sharply with Harris’s more traditional diplomatic strategies, which emphasize alliances and multilateralism.
The US 2024 election will see varied voter dynamics. Trump continues to enjoy strong support from his base, but faces challenges with moderate Republicans and independents disillusioned by his conduct. Harris, on the other hand, must energize the Democratic base while also appealing to centrist voters who are critical of more progressive policies.
The upcoming presidential elections promise to be a fierce battle between Trump and Harris, each representing starkly different visions for America’s future. As campaign strategies unfold, the candidates will not only be vying for votes but also for the narrative that will shape the political discourse leading into the election. Voter engagement and turnout will be crucial, as both sides seek to mobilize their bases while reaching out to undecided voters in this pivotal moment in American history.
The outcome of the 2024 U.S. presidential elections, particularly between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, will have significant implications for global politics, economics, and security. Here’s how each candidate’s policies might impact the international landscape.
A Trump Presidency would likely continue his “America First” approach, emphasizing nationalism and unilateralism. This could lead to strained relationships with traditional allies, as he may prioritize bilateral deals over multilateral agreements. His stance on NATO and other alliances could prompt European nations to reconsider their defense strategies.
In contrast, Harris would likely reinvigorate multilateral diplomacy, strengthening alliances with NATO, the EU, and other partners. Her approach may enhance cooperation on global issues such as climate change and international security, potentially restoring U.S. leadership in global affairs.
Trump’s administration would likely focus on renegotiating trade agreements to favor U.S. interests, which could lead to increased tariffs and trade tensions, particularly with China. This could disrupt global supply chains and create uncertainty in international markets.
Harris may pursue more cooperative trade policies aimed at rebuilding relationships with allies and addressing issues like fair trade practices. This approach could stabilize global markets and encourage international collaboration.
A return to Trump’s policies might result in the U.S. withdrawing from international climate agreements, undermining global efforts to combat climate change. This could slow progress on crucial environmental initiatives and diminish funding for renewable energy projects worldwide.
Harris’s focus on climate action could lead to renewed commitments to international agreements like the Paris Accord. Her leadership might galvanize global initiatives aimed at reducing emissions and promoting sustainable development, fostering international collaboration on environmental issues.
Trump’s administration may adopt a more transactional approach to human rights, prioritizing national interests over promoting democracy globally. This could embolden authoritarian regimes and diminish U.S. influence in advocating for democratic values.
Harris would likely emphasize human rights and democratic governance, advocating for democratic reforms in various regions. This could lead to increased U.S. support for civil society and democratic movements, potentially enhancing global democratic norms.
A Trump administration might withdraw from international military commitments, reducing U.S. involvement in conflicts and peacekeeping efforts. This could create power vacuums, particularly in regions like the Middle East, potentially leading to increased instability.
Harris: Harris would likely favor a more engaged U.S. military presence focused on global security threats, including terrorism and cyber threats. Her administration might strengthen international coalitions to address shared security challenges.
The 2024 U.S. presidential elections will not only shape the future of America but also influence the trajectory of global affairs. The stark contrast between Trump’s nationalist policies and Harris’s commitment to multilateralism will resonate across borders, affecting international relations, trade, climate action, human rights, and security dynamics worldwide. The outcome will be closely watched by leaders and citizens around the globe, highlighting the interconnectedness of today’s geopolitical landscape.
