Qamar Bashir
The recent Pahalgam terrorist attack was a moment of immense sorrow. Yet, what followed revealed something even more profound: a sharp disconnect between the Indian government’s rhetoric of blame and revenge and the people’s call for sanity, justice, and unity. Across religions—Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs alike—ordinary citizens rejected the narrative of war and communal hatred. They demanded that the tragedy be addressed within its own local dynamics, not be weaponized into a new wave of regional or
religious conflict.
While politicians rushed to escalate tensions, threatening military action, suspending
diplomatic ties, and even proposing to abrogate the Indus Waters Treaty, a different voice
rose from the streets and social media: the voice of the people. Ordinary Indians and
Kashmiris expressed fatigue with political exploitation of tragedies. They insisted that the
attack be treated strictly as a criminal act, calling for justice through proper investigation
and prosecution, rather than communal or geopolitical confrontation.
This episode exposed the widening gulf between the Indian government’s escalationist
approach and the people’s yearning for peace. While Modi and his allies chose the path
of military threats, diplomatic brinkmanship, and communal rhetoric, ordinary citizens
across India—Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs—embraced a vision of unity, compassion, and
moral clarity.
Despite the horror of the attack, it was the ordinary citizens — not the government —
who showed true patriotism. Across Kashmir and the rest of India, Hindus, Muslims,
Sikhs, and Christians came together in solidarity, rejecting the poisonous narrative of
communal hatred.
In Kashmir, locals risked their lives to save stranded tourists, carried the wounded on
horseback, and offered shelter without asking about religion. Indian Muslims nationwide
condemned the attack unequivocally, delivering anti-terror sermons from over 550,000
mosques and praying for the victims. Candlelight marches, shutdowns in mourning, and
spontaneous calls for peace reflected the real spirit of India.
Many Indians, including prominent journalists, analysts, and activists, pointed out the
bitter irony that by promoting hatred and aggressive retaliation, the Modi government
was advancing the very agenda terrorists intended. Social media erupted with criticism,
observing that the terrorists had aimed to ignite Hindu-Muslim violence—and official
rhetoric was playing directly into that plan.
While Modi’s hollow threats were taken seriously by the Pakistani government, which
retaliated with "equal and proportionate" counteractions, the people of Pakistan brushed
aside all threats. Contrary to being terrified by Indian war cries and threats to strangulate
their population by cutting off water, Pakistanis felt jubilant and galvanized, seeing
echoes of India's humiliation during the failed 2019 surgical strikes. Instead of cowering,
the Pakistani population displayed resilience and confidence, refusing to be bullied.
Internationally too, while governments condemned the Pahalgam incident, they notably
refrained from blaming Pakistan directly. Thus, Modi’s orchestrated attempt to
weaponize the tragedy — to whip up nationalist frenzy at home and intimidate Pakistan
abroad — fell flat, achieving none of its objectives and leaving him isolated on the global
stage.
Citizens questioned how, despite the presence of nearly 900,000 Indian troops stationed
across Kashmir, a heavily patrolled tourist area could have been attacked. Many Hindus,
Muslims, and Sikhs emphasized that the tragedy demanded honest answers and better
protection for civilians, not external blame or religious polarization.
Testimonies from the ground painted a strikingly different picture than the government’s
war narrative. Hindu survivors recounted how Muslim villagers in Kashmir rescued and
sheltered them, hid them from the attackers, fed them, and ensured their safe passage to
airports. One Hindu tourist from Maharashtra said, “We were trapped, terrified. Muslim
families opened their homes to us, fed us, and gave us courage. Without them, we would
not be alive today.”
Another Sikh tourist from Punjab shared, “Our Muslim brothers risked their lives to
shield us. One of them even got injured while trying to get us to safety. We owe them
everything.” A local Kashmiri Muslim explained, “We saw them as guests, not Hindus or
Sikhs. Terrorists wanted bloodshed between communities. We wanted to protect peace.”
These powerful stories spread across social media but were largely ignored by major
news outlets, which continued to amplify calls for retaliation.
A particularly moving testimony came from a young Hindu boy, whose interview with
major channels and social media went viral. In a voice trembling with emotion, he
pointed out the glaring security failure, stating that although the Indian army maintained a
base near the tourist spot, not even a police constable or military guard was present when
the attack happened. The terrorists, he noted, came freely, carried out their heinous act,
and fled without facing any resistance. His words resonated with millions, exposing the
urgent need for accountability rather than externalized blame.
One activist summed it up: “When Muslims were lynched, there were no diplomatic
crises. Now, when Hindus are attacked, it becomes a matter of national honor? Justice
must be the same for all, or it is not justice.” The hypocrisy was not lost on the public.
Many saw the selective outrage as proof that communal divisions were politically
convenient rather than morally grounded.
Perhaps most strikingly, this tragedy revealed a new assertiveness among Kashmiris.
They rejected any collective blame and firmly asserted their Indian identity. A Kashmiri
youth leader stated, “We are Indians. We have nothing to do with Pakistan. This attack is
a crime against our people too. Don’t treat us as suspects. Treat us as victims demanding
justice.” Kashmiris held rallies condemning the attack, organized interfaith prayers, and
assisted stranded tourists without discrimination. Their message was clear: they were
citizens of India, demanding equal protection and dignity.
The aftermath of the Pahalgam attack could have been a descent into greater darkness.
But thanks to the wisdom of the common people—Hindus, Muslims, and Sikhs—there is
still hope. They have demonstrated that terrorism can be defeated not only by military
means but by unity, humanity, and a refusal to surrender to hatred. If political leaders fail
to learn from this, they will find themselves increasingly out of touch with the true spirit
of the nation. The people have spoken clearly: they will not be pawns in a game of hate.
They will stand together.
Writer is Press Secretary to the President (Rtd)
Former Press Minister at Embassy of Pakistan to France
Former MD, SRBC
Macomb, Detroit,
